Physical methods of YSZ film application on solid oxide fuel cell electrolyte

Authors

  • S. Opakhay L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazakhstan, Nur-Sultan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/RCPh.2020.v72.i1.09
        54 49

Abstract

Today high effective and sensitive physical methods are used to deposit thin and durable YSZ films (zirconium oxide stabilized by yttrium) for a solid oxide fuel cells electrolyte. The review article is intended to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of perspective physical methods used in the papers of various authors, such as reactive magnetron and plasma sputtering, pulsed laser deposition. One of the main advantages of the pulsed laser deposition method is the choice of the background gas and the ambient pressure during the emission of the ultraviolet camera and the evaporation energy, however, the penetration of microporous particles and target particles on the substrate surface leads to structural changes caused by deformation of the film, as well as a change in the morphology of the film surface YSZ. In this paper, the advantages and disadvantages of the remaining methods are discussed in detail by comparing the articles of the authors. In particular, from the above methods, special attention is paid to the features of the reactive magnetron sputtering method, and it is shown that this method is the most effective, sensitive, expressive method for future use.

References

1 R. Bove, Recent Trends in Fuel Cell Science and Technology. S. Basu, Ed. (New York, 2007), p.267-285.

2 S.C. Singhal and K. Kendall, High Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Design and Applications, (Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2003), 406 p.

3 A. Choudhury, H. Chandra, and A. Arora, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20, 430-442 (2013).

4 M.C. Williams, Fuel Cells, 1, 78-85 (2007).

5 W. Winkler, In High temperature solid oxide fuel cells: fundamentals, design and applications. In: Singhal S.C. and Kendall K. (eds), (Oxford, Elsevier, 2003), p.53–82.

6 Y. Du, N. Hedayat, et al, Materialia, 1, 198-210 (2018).

7 Da Silva F.S., and de Souza T. M., Int J Hydrogen Energ, 42(41), 26020 (2017).

8 U.M. Damo, M.L. Ferrari, A. Turan, and A.F. Massardo, Energy, 168(C), 235-246 (2019).

9 Z. Yang, M. Guo, et al, Han Int J of Hydrogen Energy, 42(39), 24959 (2017).

10 L.A. Dunyushkina Vvedeniye v metody polucheniya plenochnykh elektrolitov dlya tverdooksidnykh toplivnykh elementov. Monografiya, (Yekaterinburg: URO RAN, 2015), 126 s. (in Russ).

11 S. Ryu, S. Lee, et al, Surface and Coatings Technology, 369, 265-268 (2019).

12 Y. Li, L.M. Wong, et al, Surface and Coatings Technology, 320, 344–348 (2017).

13 R. Pascu, S. Somacescu, G. Epurescu, et al, Thin Solid Films, 553, 98–103 (2014).

14 H.N. Krogstad, Materials Science and Engineering,72, 1-54 (2012).

15 J. Qian, Z. Tao, et al, Int J of Hydrogen Energy, 38(5), 2407–2412 (2013).

16 T. Mukai, T. Fujita, et al, J of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, 12(3), 031002 (2015).

17 M. Gupta, A. Weber, N. Markocsan, & M. Gindrat, J of the Electrochemical Society, 163(9), F1059-F1065 (2016).

18 S.L. Zhang, H.X. Yu, et al, J of Materials Chemistry A, 4(19), 7461–7468 (2016).

19 Y.C. Yang, T.H. Chang, et al, Int J of Hydrogen Energy, 37(18), 13746–13754 (2012).

20 D. Waldbillig and O. Kesler, Surface and Coatings Technology, 205(23-24), 5483-5492 (2011).

21 P. Coddet, M.L. Amany, et al, Surface and Coatings Technology, 357, 103-113 (2018).

22 D. Depla, A. Besnard, and J. Lamas, Vacuum, 125, 118-122 (2016).

23 A.A. Solovyev, S.V. Rabotkin, et al, J of Physics: Conference Series, 552, 012010 (2014).

24 H. Wang, W. Ji, et al, Solid State Ionics, 192(1), 413-418 (2011).

25 H. Hidalgo, A.L. Thomann, et al, Fuel Cells, 13(2) 279–288 (2012).

Downloads

Published

2020-03-28

Issue

Section

Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Problems. NanoScience