The effectiveness of ICT in teaching physics

Authors

  • K.M. Turekhanova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakstan, Almaty
  • Zh.Ye. Akimkhanova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakstan, Almaty
  • J. Gani Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakstan, Almaty

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/rcph-2019-i2-18
        237 136

Keywords:

education, physics, ICT, methods, knowledge, pedagogy, e-learning

Abstract

In the 21st century, the modern employment cannot be imagined without the using of information and communication technology (ICT). Information technology is a set of mathematical and cybernetic techniques that provide the collection, storage, processing and transportation of information on the basis of modern computer technology. Among all educational disciplines, physics is able to easily maintain a computer subject. For a long time the computer has been successfully used here to facilitate the routine work of performing calculations. But information communication technologies can also be used to study theoretical material, training, as a means of modeling and visualization, etc. The choice depends on the goals, objectives and stage of the lesson (explanation, consolidation, repetition of the material, knowledge test, etc.). The most effective way of world informative education space is to fully supply ICT to each branch of education. This paper shows that the use of modern innovative educational methods and technologies is an important component for organizing an effective educational process in physics lessons. The process of informatization in education raises the level of training of teachers, students and the quality of the profession. It allows the student to self-development, self-education and creativity.

References

1 A. Heck, Perspectives on an Integrated Computer Learning Environment, (Doctoral Thesis. Amsterdam: Can Uitgeverij, 2012).

2 T. de Jong, S. Sotiriou, and D. Gillet, J. Smart Learning Environments, 1(3), 1-16 (2014).

3 N.D. Finkelstein & S.J. Pollock, Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 1, 010101 (2005).

4 A. Karbowski, K. Służewski, G. Karwasz, M. Juszczyńska, R. Viola, M. Gervasio, and M. Michelini, Europhys. Conf. Abstract Booklet, 48 (2009).

5 A.M. Düsebekova & D.S. Karïmjan, Abay at. QazUPW xabarşısı. Pedagogïka ğılımdarı, 3(59), 88-88 (2018). (in Kaz.)

6 D. Gillet, M.J. Rodríguez-Triana, T. de Jong, L. Bollen and D. Dikke, 2017 4th Experiment @ Intern. Conf. (exp.at'17), Faro, 208-213 (2017).

7 P. Heller & M.Hollabaugh, Am. J. Phys., 60(7), 637-644 (1992).

8 С. Howe & М.Abedin, Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356 (2013).

9 G. Karwasz, A. Karbowski, M. Michelini, R. Viola, and W. Peeters, GIREP 2008 Intern. Conf. “Physics Curriculum Design, Development and Validation. Book of Abstract, 142 (2008).

10 V. Koudelkova & L. Dvorak, ICPE-EPEC 2013 Conference Proceedings, 2014, 898-905 (2014).

11 L.C. McDermott, Am. J. Phys., 67, 755 (1999).

12 Е. Mortimer & Р. Scott Meaning, Making in Secondary Science Classrooms, (Maidenhead Philadelphia: Open University Press, 2003), 157 p.

13 D.R. Sokoloff & R.K.Thornton, Interactive Lecture Demonstrations: Active Learning in Introductory Physics, 2006, 374p.

14 D. Sokolowska, J. de Meyere, M. Wojtaszek, W. Zawadzki, and G. Brzezinka, Edukacja Biologiczna i Środowiskowa (eng.), 1(54), 27-38 (2015).

15 A.T. Turalbaeva, Z.Z. Äsemjanova, Abay at. QazUPW xabarşısı. Pedagogïka ğılımdarı serïyası, 3(59), 28 (2018). (in Kaz).

16 K.M. Turekhanova, Zh.E. Akimkhanova, and M.S. Nurzhanova, Bulletin of KazTITU, 4(122), 124 (2017).

17 K.M. Turekhanova, Zh.E. Akimkhanova, Rec. Contr. To Phys., 2 (61), 142-146 (2017) (in Kaz).

Downloads

How to Cite

Turekhanova, K., Akimkhanova, Z., & Gani, J. (2019). The effectiveness of ICT in teaching physics. Recent Contributions to Physics (Rec.Contr.Phys.), 69(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.26577/rcph-2019-i2-18

Issue

Section

Methods of teaching high school physics