MCNP6 calculation of neutron flux map in the httr during normal operation

Authors

  • H.Q. Ho Sector of Fast Reactor and Advanced Reactor Research and Development, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), 4002 Narita-cho, Oarai-machi, Higashi Ibaraki-gun, Ibaraki-ken, 311-1393, Japan http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7096-3318
  • E. Ishitsuka Sector of Fast Reactor and Advanced Reactor Research and Development, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), 4002 Narita-cho, Oarai-machi, Higashi Ibaraki-gun, Ibaraki-ken, 311-1393, Japan http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5927-0652
  • K. Iigaki Sector of Fast Reactor and Advanced Reactor Research and Development, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), 4002 Narita-cho, Oarai-machi, Higashi Ibaraki-gun, Ibaraki-ken, 311-1393, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/RCPh.2022.v82.i3.03
        65 54

Keywords:

HTTR, HTGR, MCNP6, neutron flux, fmesh

Abstract

Detailed neutron flux distribution is important to understand the neutronic behavior during operation as well as to precise the core optimization and safety analysis of a reactor. In the literature, no calculations have been performed to show the detailed neutron flux map for the high temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) because of the limitation of the old neutronic codes and the low performance of the computing system. HTTR is a prismatic type reactor, helium gas-cooled, and graphite-moderated, providing 30 MWth power and up to 950 oC outlet temperature. The present work deals with MCNP6 Monte-Carlo calculation to determine the detailed neutron flux map in the HTTR during normal operation. At first, the calculation of neutron flux at several positions in the reactor was validated by comparing the corresponding reaction rate between the calculation and measurement. After that detailed neutron flux with the small cells of 1cm×1cm×10cm was obtained for the entire reactor core using the fmesh tally of MCNP6 code.

References

1 S. Saito, et al., Report of the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, (Report no. JAERI 1332, 1994).

2 M. Ogawa, and T. Nishihara, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 233, 5–10 (2004).

3 M. Goto, et al., Nuclear Engineering and Design, 251, 181–190 (2012).

4 S. Takada, et al., Nuclear Engineering and Design, 271, 472–478 (2014).

5 T. Nishihara, et al., JAEA-Technology, 2018-004 (2018).

6 T. Takeda, and Y. Inagaki, et al., JSME Series in Thermal and Nuclear Power Generation 5 (2021), 464 p.

7 N. Fujimoto, et al., Nuclear Engineering and Design, 233, 23–36 (2004).

8 M. Goto, et al., Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 43 (10), 1237-1244 (2006).

9 M. Goto, et al., Nuclear Engineering and Design, 240, 2994–2998 (2010).

10 M. Goto, et al., Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 48 (7), 965-969 (2011).

11 J.D. Bess, Fujimoto N., Nuclear Science and Engineering, 178 (3), 414-427 (2014).

12 H.Q. Ho, et al., Annals of Nuclear Energy, 103, 114–121 (2017).

13 H.Q. Ho, et al., Annals of Nuclear Energy, 112, 42–47 (2018).

14 N. Fujimoto, et al., Annals of Nuclear Energy, 158, 108270 (2021).

15 T. Goorley, et al., Nuclear Technology, 180, 298-315 (2012).

16 Evaluation of High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor Performance: Benchmark Analysis Related to Initial Testing of the HTTR and HTR-10. IAEA-Technical Document No. 1382, 2003. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

17 M.B. Chadwick, et al., Nuclear Data Sheets, 112, 2887-2996 (2011).

18 C.J. Werner, “MCNP User’s Manual - Code Version 6.2”. Los Alamos National Laboratory, report LA-UR-17-29981 (2017).

19 A.L. Swift, et al., A Verification of MCNP6 FMESH Tally Capabilities, US (2014).
https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1164452.

20 T. Goorley, et al., Annals of Nuclear Energy, 87, 772-783 (2016).

Downloads

Published

2022-09-20

Issue

Section

Theoretical Physics. Nuclear and Elementary Particle Physics. Astrophysics