Features of the distribution of events by the multiple of secondary particles depending on the energy of collision and the assymetricity of collising relativistic nuclei

Authors

  • A.I. Fedosimova Satbayev University, Institute of Physics and Technology, Kazakhstan, Almaty; Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kazakhstan, Almaty http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9607-6074
  • I.A. Lebedev Satbayev University, Institute of Physics and Technology, Kazakhstan, Almaty; Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kazakhstan, Almaty http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-9925
  • Е.А. Dmitriyeva Satbayev University, Institute of Physics and Technology, Kazakhstan, Almaty; Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kazakhstan, Almaty http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1280-2559
  • S.A. Ibraimova Satbayev University, Institute of Physics and Technology, Kazakhstan, Almaty; Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kazakhstan, Almaty http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6652-9252
  • E.A. Bondar Satbayev University, Institute of Physics and Technology, Kazakhstan, Almaty; Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kazakhstan, Almaty http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6745-5462
  • P.M. Krassovitskiy Satbayev University, Institute of Physics and Technology, Kazakhstan, Almaty; Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kazakhstan, Almaty http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8145-7974

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/RCPh.2021.v78.i3.09
        62 32

Keywords:

multiplicity of secondary particles, pseudo-rapidity distributions, nuclear emulsions, inelastic interactions of nuclei

Abstract

To search for signals of the phase transition of matter from the hadronic state to the quark-gluon plasma, interactions with extreme characteristics are studied. The study of the dependence of the average multiplicity on the projectile energy for sulfur and silicon nuclei with energies of 3.7 AGeV, 14 AGeV, and 200 AGeV has been carried out. Experimental data on inelastic interactions with the nuclei of the NIKFI BR-2 emulsion obtained at the SPS at CERN and at the Synchrophasotron at JINR. To take into account fluctuations in the initial conditions of the nucleus-nucleus interaction, the events were divided into central and peripheral ones. A comparative analysis of the average multiplicity with heavy and light nuclei of the photographic emulsion is presented. The multiplicity increase factor has an almost linear increase in energy (on the logarithmic axis) for all events, except for the central interactions of sulfur nuclei with heavy emulsion nuclei at 200 AGeV. These events are explosive events, which give a flux of secondary particles in a narrow range of average pseudo-rapidity and significantly shifted towards low values <η>. The analysis of events of complete destruction of the projectile nucleus is presented. Such events are considered as events in which the most favorable conditions are created for the formation of a quark-gluon plasma.

References

1 R.P. Scharenberg, B.K. Srivastava, A.S. Hirsch and C. Pajares, Universe 4, 96 (2018).

2 D. Sahu, S. Tripathy, G.S. Pradhan and R. Sahoo, Physical review C 101, ID.014902 (2020).

3 J.E. Bernhard., J.S. Moreland and Bass S.A., Nuclear physics A 967, 293-296 (2017).

4 A.M. Syam Kumar, J.P.Prasanth and Vishnu M.Bannur, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 432, 71-75 (2015).

5 X.B. Zhang and Q.R. Zhang, Communications in Theoretical physics 32, 575-582, (1999).

6 G. Ropke, Contributions to Plasma Physics 43, 350-354 (2003).

7 Alice Ohlson, XXVIIth International Conference on Ultrarelativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions (Quark Matter 2018), Nuclear Physics A 982, 299–302 (2019).

8 S. Bhattacharyya, M. Haiduc, A.T. Neagu and E. Firu, Canadian Journal of Physics 98, 153-157 (2020).

9 U. Abdurakhmanov U., K. Gulamov, V. Lugovoi and V. Navotny, Advances in High Energy Physics 2018, ID.3098252 (2018).

10 S. Bhattacharyya, Canadian Journal of Physics 99, 340-346 (2021).

11 M.H. Rasool M.H. and S. Ahmad, Chinese Journal of Physics 55, 260-267 (2017).

12 S. Bhattacharyya, M. Haiduc, A.T. Neagu and E. Firu, EPL 126, ID.42001 (2019).

13 S. Bhattacharyya, M. Haiduc, A.T. Neagu and E.Firu, Canadian J. of Phys. 98, 153-157 (2020).

14 A. Kawecka, Photonics applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High Energy Physics Experiments 11581, ID.1158113 (2020).

15 S. Bhattacharyya, International journal of modern physics E 29, ID.2050020 (2020).

16 S. Basu, S. Thakur, T.K. Nayak and C.A. Pruneau, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 48, ID.025103 (2021).

17 K. Kawaguchi, K. Murase and T. Hirano, Nuclear Physics A 967, 357-360 (2017).

18 N.P. Andreeva, A.Sh. Gaitinov, I.A. Lebedev, V.I. Skorobogatova, L.N. Filippova and D.B. Shaikhieva, Physics of Elementary Particles and Atomic Nucleus. Experiment 4, 67-72 (2007).

19 S. Kumar, M.K. Singh, V. Singh and R.K. Jain, The European Physical Journal Plus 136, 115(2021).

20 Zhi Zhang, Tian-Li Ma and Dong-Hai Zhang, Physics Procedia 80, 50-53(2015).

21 W. Bari and N.A. Rather, Ukrainian Journal of Physics 62, 12-19 (2017).

22 G. Bhoumik, S. Bhattacharyya, A. Deb and D. Ghosh, European Physical Journal A 51, N.78 (2015).

23 D. Ghosh, A. Deb, S. Bhattacharyya and U. Datta, Physica Scripta 85, ID.065205 (2012).

24 A. Sh. Gaitinov, P.B. Kharchevnikov, I.A. Lebedev and A.I. Lebedeva, HEP-Ph. 1, 1-10, (2012).

25 A.I. Fedosimova, A. Sh. Gaitinov, E. Grushevskaya and I. Lebedev, EPJ Web of Conferences 145, ID.19009 (2017).

26 I.A. Lebedev, A.T. Temiraliev and A.I. Fedosimova, Knowledge E Energy & Physics 3, 102-108 (2018).

27 M.I. Adamovich et al., Part.Nucl.Lett. 4(101), 75-82, (2000).

28 M.I. Adamovich et al., Phys. Lett. B. 227, 285-290, (1989).

29 A.I. Fedosimova, A.Sh. Gaitinov, I.A. Lebedev and A.T Temiraliev, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 668, ID 012067 (2016).

30 E. Andronov, Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement 10(3), 449-453 (2017).

31 Ying Yuan, Radiation measurements 43, 250-253 (2008).

Downloads

Published

2021-09-06

Issue

Vol. 78 No. 3 (2021): Recent Contributions to Physics

Section

Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Problems. NanoScience

Most read articles by the same author(s)